Pharmacokinetics of isavuconazole at different target sites in healthy volunteers after single and multiple intravenous infusions.

BACKGROUND: Invasive aspergillosis is a severe fungal infection that affects multiple organ systems including the CNS and the lungs. Isavuconazole, a novel triazole antifungal agent, has demonstrated promising activity against Aspergillus spp. However, data on the penetration of isavuconazole into the CNS and ELF and intracellular accumulation remain limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-centre pharmacokinetic (PK) study in 12 healthy volunteers. Subjects received seven doses of 200 mg isavuconazole to achieve an assumed steady-state. After the first and final infusion, plasma sampling was conducted over 8 and 12 h, respectively. All subjects underwent one lumbar puncture and bronchoalveolar lavage, at either 2, 6 or 12 h post-infusion of the final dose. PBMCs were collected in six subjects from blood to determine intracellular isavuconazole concentrations at 6, 8 or 12 h. The AUC/MIC was calculated for an MIC value of 1 mg/L, which marks the EUCAST susceptibility breakpoint for Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus flavus. RESULTS: C max and AUC0-24h of isavuconazole in plasma under assumed steady-state conditions were 6.57 ±â€Š1.68 mg/L (mean ±â€ŠSD) and 106 ±â€Š32.1 h·mg/L, respectively. The average concentrations measured in CSF, ELF and in PBMCs were 0.07 ±â€Š0.03, 0.94 ±â€Š0.46 and 27.1 ±â€Š17.8 mg/L, respectively. The AUC/MIC in plasma, CSF, ELF and in PBMCs under steady-state conditions were 106 ±â€Š32.1, 1.68 ±â€Š0.72, 22.6 ±â€Š11.0 and 650 ±â€Š426 mg·h/L, respectively. CONCLUSION: Isavuconazole demonstrated moderate penetration into ELF, low penetrability into CSF and high accumulation in PBMCs. Current dosing regimens resulted in sufficient plasma exposure in all subjects to treat isolates with MICs ≤ 1 mg/L.

Linezolid brain penetration in neurointensive care patients.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid exposure in critically ill patients is associated with high inter-individual variability, potentially resulting in subtherapeutic antibiotic exposure. Linezolid exhibits good penetration into the CSF, but its penetration into cerebral interstitial fluid (ISF) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine linezolid penetration into CSF and cerebral ISF of neurointensive care patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five neurocritical care patients received 600 mg of linezolid IV twice daily for treatment of extracerebral infections. At steady state, blood and CSF samples were collected from arterial and ventricular catheters, and microdialysate was obtained from a cerebral intraparenchymal probe. RESULTS: The median fAUC0-24 was 57.6 (24.9-365) mg·h/L in plasma, 64.1 (43.5-306.1) mg·h/L in CSF, and 27.0 (10.7-217.6) mg·h/L in cerebral ISF. The median penetration ratio (fAUCbrain_or_CSF/fAUCplasma) was 0.5 (0.25-0.81) for cerebral ISF and 0.92 (0.79-1) for CSF. Cerebral ISF concentrations correlated well with plasma (R = 0.93, P < 0.001) and CSF levels (R = 0.93, P < 0.001).The median fAUC0-24/MIC ratio was ≥100 in plasma and CSF for MICs of ≤0.5 mg/L, and in cerebral ISF for MICs of ≤0.25 mg/L. The median fT>MIC was ≥80% of the dosing interval in CSF for MICs of ≤0.5 mg/L, and in plasma and cerebral ISF for MICs of ≤0.25 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid demonstrates a high degree of cerebral penetration, and brain concentrations correlate well with plasma and CSF levels. However, substantial variability in plasma levels, and thus cerebral concentrations, may result in subtherapeutic tissue concentrations in critically ill patients with standard dosing, necessitating therapeutic drug monitoring.

Plasma and intraperitoneal pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime/avibactam in peritoneal dialysis patients.

OBJECTIVES: Peritonitis is a serious complication in patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) that increases morbidity and frequently disqualifies patients from the peritoneal dialysis programme. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) is a potential treatment option for APD patients with peritonitis caused by resistant Gram-negative bacteria, but limited data exist on systemic and target-site pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients undergoing APD. This study set out to investigate the PK of CAZ/AVI in plasma and peritoneal dialysate (PDS) of patients undergoing APD. METHODS: A prospective, open-label PK study was conducted on eight patients undergoing APD. CAZ/AVI was administered as a single intravenous dose of 2 g/0.5 g over 120 minutes. APD cycles were initiated 15 hours after the study drug administration. Dense PDS and plasma sampling was performed for 24 hours after the start of administration. PK parameters were analysed with population PK modelling. Probability of target attainment (PTA) was simulated for different CAZ/AVI doses. RESULTS: PK profiles of both drugs in plasma and PDS were similar, indicating that the two drugs are well suited for a fixed-dose combination. A two-compartment model best described the PK of both drugs. A single dose of 2 g/0.5 g CAZ/AVI led to concentrations that far exceeded the PK/PD targets of both drugs. In the Monte Carlo simulations, even the lowest dose (750/190 mg CAZ/AVI) achieved a PTA of >90% for MICs up to 8 mg/L (The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing epidemiological cut-off value for Pseudomonas aeruginosa) in plasma and PDS. DISCUSSION: On the basis of PTA simulations, a dose of 750/190 mg CAZ/AVI would be sufficient to treat plasma and peritoneal fluid infections in patients undergoing APD.

Individualized antimicrobial dose optimization: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring and Model-informed precision dosing allow dose individualization to increase drug effectivity and reduce toxicity. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the available evidence on the clinical efficacy of individualized antimicrobial dosing optimization. METHODS: Data sources: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from database inception to 11 November 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Published peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials. PARTICIPANTS: Human subjects aged ≥18 years receiving an antibiotic or antifungal drug. INTERVENTIONS: Patients receiving individualized antimicrobial dose adjustment. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: The primary outcome was the risk of mortality. Secondary outcomes included target attainment, treatment failure, clinical and microbiological cure, length of stay, treatment duration, and adverse events. Effect sizes were pooled using a random-effects model. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by inconsistency testing (I2). RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis (1241 participants; n = 624 in the individualized antimicrobial dosing group and n = 617 in the control group). Individualized antimicrobial dose optimization was associated with a numerical decrease in mortality (risk ratio [RR] = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.71-1.05), without reaching statistical significance. Moreover, it was associated with significantly higher target attainment rates (RR = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.13-1.76) and a significant decrease in treatment failure (RR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.92). Individualized antimicrobial dose optimization was associated with improvement, but not significant in clinical cure (RR = 1.33; 95% CI, 0.94-1.33) and microbiological outcome (RR = 1.25; CI, 1.00-1.57), as well as with a significant decrease in the risk of nephrotoxicity (RR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated that target attainment, treatment failure, and nephrotoxicity were significantly improved in patients who underwent individualized antimicrobial dose optimization. It showed an improvement in mortality, clinical cure or microbiological outcome, although not significant.

Comparison of ultrafiltration and microdialysis for ceftriaxone protein-binding determination.

BACKGROUND: High protein binding (PB) of antibiotics has an impact on their antimicrobial activity. It has been questioned whether in vitro PB determination can capture the dynamic and concentration-dependent PB of highly bound antibiotics. OBJECTIVES: This clinical study compared in vitro ultrafiltration (UF) and in vivo IV microdialysis (MD) methods to determine ceftriaxone PB. METHODS: Six healthy male volunteers received a single IV 2 g dose of ceftriaxone. Unbound ceftriaxone plasma concentrations were measured with MD and venous plasma sampling with subsequent UF. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. Non-linear mixed-effects modelling was used to quantify the PB. The PTA was estimated. RESULTS: The Cmax of ceftriaxone total plasma concentration (297.42 ±â€Š21.0 mg/L) was approximately 5.5-fold higher than for free concentrations obtained with UF (52.83 ±â€Š5.07 mg/L), and only 3.5-fold higher than for free concentrations obtained with MD (81.37 ±â€Š26.93 mg/L). Non-linear, saturable PB binding was confirmed for both UF and MD. Significantly different dissociation constants (Kd) for the albumin/ceftriaxone complex were quantified: in UF it was 23.7 mg/L (95% CI 21.3-26.2) versus 15.9 mg/L (95% CI 13.6-18.6) in MD. Moreover, the estimated number of binding sites (95% CI) per albumin molecule was 0.916 (0.86-0.97) in UF versus 0.548 in MD (0.51-0.59). The PTA obtained with MD was at most 27% higher than with UF. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro UF versus in vivo intravasal MD revealed significantly different PB, especially during the distribution phase. The method of PB determination could have an impact on the breakpoint determination and dose optimisation of antibiotics.

Relationship between Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment and Microbiological Outcome in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients with Documented Gram-Negative Superinfections Treated with TDM-Guided Continuous-Infusion Meropenem.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to explore the relationship between pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of continuous-infusion (CI) meropenem and microbiological outcome in critical COVID-19 patients with documented Gram-negative superinfections. Methods: Patients receiving CI meropenem for documented Gram-negative infections at the COVID ICU of the IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring from January 2021 to February 2022 were retrospectively assessed. Average steady-state meropenem concentrations (Css) were calculated and the Css/MIC ratio was selected as a pharmacodynamic parameter of meropenem efficacy. The Css/MIC ratio was defined as optimal if ≥4, quasi-optimal if between 1 and 4, and suboptimal if <1. The relationship between Css/MIC and microbiological outcome was assessed. Results: Overall, 43 critical COVID-19 patients with documented Gram-negative infections were retrieved. Combination therapy was implemented in 26 cases. Css/MIC ratios were optimal in 27 (62.8%), quasi-optimal in 7 (16.3%), and suboptimal in 9 cases (20.9%). Microbiological failure occurred in 21 patients (48.8%), with no difference between monotherapy and combination therapy (43.8% vs. 53.8%; p = 0.53). The microbiological failure rate was significantly lower in patients with an optimal Css/MIC ratio compared to those with a quasi-optimal or suboptimal Css/MIC ratio (33.3% vs. 75.0%; p = 0.01). Conclusion: Suboptimal attainment of meropenem PK/PD targets may be a major determinant impacting on microbiological failure in critical COVID-19 patients with Gram-negative superinfections.

Biomarkers Predicting Tissue Pharmacokinetics of Antimicrobials in Sepsis: A Review.

The pathophysiology of sepsis alters drug pharmacokinetics, resulting in inadequate drug exposure and target-site concentration. Suboptimal exposure leads to treatment failure and the development of antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, we seek to optimize antimicrobial therapy in sepsis by selecting the right drug and the correct dosage. A prerequisite for achieving this goal is characterization and understanding of the mechanisms of pharmacokinetic alterations. However, most infections take place not in blood but in different body compartments. Since tissue pharmacokinetic assessment is not feasible in daily practice, we need to tailor antibiotic treatment according to the specific patient's pathophysiological processes. The complex pathophysiology of sepsis and the ineffectiveness of current targeted therapies suggest that treatments guided by biomarkers predicting target-site concentration could provide a new therapeutic strategy. Inflammation, endothelial and coagulation activation markers, and blood flow parameters might be indicators of impaired tissue distribution. Moreover, hepatic and renal dysfunction biomarkers can predict not only drug metabolism and clearance but also drug distribution. Identification of the right biomarkers can direct drug dosing and provide timely feedback on its effectiveness. Therefore, this might decrease antibiotic resistance and the mortality of critically ill patients. This article fills the literature gap by characterizing patient biomarkers that might be used to predict unbound plasma-to-tissue drug distribution in critically ill patients. Although all biomarkers must be clinically evaluated with the ultimate goal of combining them in a clinically feasible scoring system, we support the concept that the appropriate biomarkers could be used to direct targeted antibiotic dosing. ADAMTS-13 a disintegrin-like and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 motif no. 13, ALAT alanine amino transferase, APACHE IV Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-IV, aPPT activated partial thromboplastin time, ASAT aspartate amino transferase, AT antithrombin, Ca-V-O2 oxygen content difference, arterial-venous, CRP C-reactive protein, ELAM endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule, ICAM intercellular adhesion molecule, IL interleukin, INR international normalized ratio, LBP lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, MCP monocyte chemoattractant protein, mHLA monocytic human leukocyte antigen, MIF migration inhibitory factor, MIP macrophage inflammatory protein, PAI plasminogen activator inhibitor, PCO2 partial pressure of carbon dioxide, PT prothrombin time, RRT renal replacement therapy, SAPSS III Simplified Acute Physiology Score-III, sO2 oxygen saturation, SOFA Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment, sTREM soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1, TLR toll-like receptor, TNF tumor necrosis factor, VCAM vascular cell adhesion molecule, VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor, vWf von Willebrand factor.

Meropenem concentrations in brain tissue of neurointensive care patients exceed CSF levels.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate antibiotic exposure in cerebral infections might have detrimental effects on clinical outcome. Commonly, antibiotic concentrations within the CSF were used to estimate cerebral target levels. However, the actual pharmacological active unbound drug concentration beyond the blood-brain barrier is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To compare meropenem concentrations in blood, CSF and cerebral microdialysate of neurointensive care patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 12 patients suffering subarachnoid haemorrhage, 2000 mg of meropenem was administered every 8 h due to an extracerebral infection. Meropenem concentrations were determined in blood, CSF and cerebral microdialysate at steady state (n = 11) and following single-dose administration (n = 5). RESULTS: At steady state, the free AUC0-8 was 233.2 ± 42.7 mg·h/L in plasma, 7.8 ± 1.9 mg·h/L in CSF and 26.6 ± 14.0 mg·h/L in brain tissue. The brain tissue penetration ratio (AUCbrain/AUCplasma) was 0.11 ± 0.06, which was more than 3 times higher than in CSF (0.03 ± 0.01), resulting in an AUCCSF/AUCbrain ratio of 0.41 ± 0.16 at steady state. After single-dose administration similar proportions were achieved (AUCbrain/AUCplasma = 0.09 ± 0.08; AUCCSF/AUCplasma = 0.02 ± 0.00). Brain tissue concentrations correlated well with CSF concentrations (R = 0.74, P < 0.001), but only moderately with plasma concentrations (R = 0.51, P < 0.001). Bactericidal thresholds were achieved in both plasma and brain tissue for MIC values ≤16 mg/L. In CSF, bactericidal effects were only reached for MIC values ≤1 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Meropenem achieves sufficient bactericidal concentrations for the most common bacterial strains of cerebral infections in both plasma and brain tissue, even in non-inflamed brain tissue. CSF concentrations would highly underestimate the target site activity of meropenem beyond the blood-brain barrier.